Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGS vs SMH
FNGS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FNGS vs SMH
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN
Price$70.39
Change-$1.61 (-2.24%)
Volume$84.06K
Net Assets539.59M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$344.82
Change-$10.71 (-3.01%)
Volume$10.65M
Net Assets37.62B
FNGS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGS vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGS is a StrongBuy and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. FNGS (540M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than FNGS: SMH (46.810) vs FNGS (25.523). FNGS was incepted earlier than SMH: FNGS (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FNGS (0.58).
| FNGS | SMH | FNGS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 25.523 | 46.810 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 540M | 37.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.35 | 166% |
| Turnover | N/A | 15.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNGS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGS | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| AMZN - FNGS | 81% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| NVDA - FNGS | 78% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| META - FNGS | 74% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| MSFT - FNGS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| GOOGL - FNGS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||