Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGS vs SMH
FNGS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FNGS vs SMH
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN
Price$69.35
Change+$0.15 (+0.22%)
Volume$144
Net Assets519.61M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$365.83
Change+$1.66 (+0.46%)
Volume$38.74K
Net Assets37.47B
FNGS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGS vs. SMH commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGS is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.5B vs. FNGS (520M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than FNGS: SMH (50.378) vs FNGS (20.642). FNGS was incepted earlier than SMH: FNGS (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FNGS (0.58).
| FNGS | SMH | FNGS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 20.642 | 50.378 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 520M | 37.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.35 | 166% |
| Turnover | N/A | 15.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNGS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGS | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| AMZN - FNGS | 81% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| NVDA - FNGS | 78% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| META - FNGS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| MSFT - FNGS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| GOOGL - FNGS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||