FNGR
Price
$1.61
Change
-$0.01 (-0.62%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
95.65M
17 days until earnings call
GRPFF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.05 (+10.00%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNGR vs GRPFF

Header iconFNGR vs GRPFF Comparison
Open Charts FNGR vs GRPFFBanner chart's image
FingerMotion
Price$1.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.62%)
Volume$117.57K
Capitalization95.65M
Grupo Televisa S.A
Price$0.55
Change+$0.05 (+10.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.47B
FNGR vs GRPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNGR vs. GRPFF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGR is a StrongBuy and GRPFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FNGR: $1.61 vs. GRPFF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: FNGR and GRPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNGR: 36% vs. GRPFF: 38%
Market capitalization -- FNGR: $95.65M vs. GRPFF: $1.47B
FNGR [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $95.65M. GRPFF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNGR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRPFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRPFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRPFF is a better buy in the long-term than FNGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNGR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRPFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNGR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GRPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNGR is a better buy in the short-term than GRPFF.

Price Growth

FNGR (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRPFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNGR is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.03% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GRPFF($1.47B) has a higher market cap than FNGR($95.6M). GRPFF YTD gains are higher at: 62.242 vs. FNGR (34.167). GRPFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.5B vs. FNGR (-5.98M). GRPFF has more cash in the bank: 38.5B vs. FNGR (2.86M). FNGR has less debt than GRPFF: FNGR (1.23M) vs GRPFF (93.5B). GRPFF has higher revenues than FNGR: GRPFF (60.3B) vs FNGR (35.7M).
FNGRGRPFFFNGR / GRPFF
Capitalization95.6M1.47B7%
EBITDA-5.98M19.5B-0%
Gain YTD34.16762.24255%
P/E RatioN/A0.05-
Revenue35.7M60.3B0%
Total Cash2.86M38.5B0%
Total Debt1.23M93.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNGR vs GRPFF: Fundamental Ratings
FNGR
GRPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNGR's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPFF (97). This means that FNGR’s stock grew similarly to GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

FNGR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GRPFF (100). This means that FNGR’s stock grew similarly to GRPFF’s over the last 12 months.

GRPFF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FNGR (97). This means that GRPFF’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

GRPFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FNGR (62). This means that GRPFF’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

GRPFF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as FNGR (100). This means that GRPFF’s stock grew similarly to FNGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNGRGRPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WLMIY22.500.23
+1.03%
Wilmar International, Ltd.
CEBUY1.50N/A
N/A
Cebu Air Inc
NCHEY12.10N/A
N/A
Nichirei Corp
SFCO9.55N/A
N/A
Southern Financial Corp.
MCLE0.15-0.01
-6.25%
MEDICALE CORP.

FNGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNGR and LILAK have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNGR and LILAK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNGR
1D Price
Change %
FNGR100%
-0.62%
LILAK - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
TV - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
LILA - FNGR
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
LUMN - FNGR
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
WOW - FNGR
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More

GRPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRPFF and FNCTF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRPFF and FNCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRPFF
1D Price
Change %
GRPFF100%
N/A
FNCTF - GRPFF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTEGF - GRPFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
HLTOY - GRPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FULO - GRPFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
FNGR - GRPFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
More