Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGLX vs RDKTX
FNGLX vs RDKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGLX vs. RDKTX commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGLX is a Hold and RDKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDKTX has more cash in the bank: 18.2B vs. FNGLX (824M). FNGLX pays higher dividends than RDKTX: FNGLX (1.33) vs RDKTX (0.72). FNGLX was incepted earlier than RDKTX: FNGLX (8 years) vs RDKTX (11 years). RDKTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FNGLX (0.46). FNGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RDKTX (5.00). FNGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDKTX: FNGLX (0) vs RDKTX (250). RDKTX (13.95) and FNGLX (13.83) have marching annual gain over last year. RDKTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.65 vs. FNGLX (35.85).
| FNGLX | RDKTX | FNGLX / RDKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.74 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.74 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.038 | 17.323 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 824M | 18.2B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.72 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.83 | 13.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.62 | 46.62 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | 41.65 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement