Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGG vs QLD
FNGG vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGG vs. QLD commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGG is a Hold and QLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 8.89B vs. FNGG (125M). FNGG has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: FNGG (20.692) vs QLD (10.544). FNGG was incepted earlier than QLD: FNGG (4 years) vs QLD (19 years). QLD (0.95) and FNGG (0.96) have comparable expense ratios . FNGG has a higher turnover QLD (24.00) vs QLD (24.00).
| FNGG | QLD | FNGG / QLD | |
| Gain YTD | 20.692 | 10.544 | 196% |
| Net Assets | 125M | 8.89B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.95 | 101% |
| Turnover | 92.00 | 24.00 | 383% |
| Yield | 0.87 | 0.22 | 390% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNGG | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 89% | 18 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNGG has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNGG jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNGG | 100% | +3.15% | ||
| NOW - FNGG | 71% Closely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| AMZN - FNGG | 71% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| CRWD - FNGG | 68% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| MSFT - FNGG | 68% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| META - FNGG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
QLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLD | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| LRCX - QLD | 81% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| META - QLD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| ARM - QLD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| CDNS - QLD | 76% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| NXPI - QLD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||