Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGAX vs REEBX
FNGAX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNGAX vs REEBX
Franklin Intl Growth A
Price$18.57
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets894.31M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$59.47
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
FNGAX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGAX vs. REEBX commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGAX is a StrongBuy and REEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FNGAX (894M). FNGAX pays higher dividends than REEBX: FNGAX (1.70) vs REEBX (0.42). FNGAX was incepted earlier than REEBX: FNGAX (17 years) vs REEBX (11 years). REEBX (1.27) is less costly to investors than FNGAX (1.20). REEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FNGAX (17.56). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNGAX: REEBX (250) vs FNGAX (1000). FNGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. REEBX (4.69). REEBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.67 vs. FNGAX (6.62).
| FNGAX | REEBX | FNGAX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.27 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.27 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.966 | 12.739 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 894M | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 0.42 | 404% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | 4.69 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.89 | 28.27 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.62 | 14.67 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.04 | 23.99 | 304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement