FNF
Price
$56.32
Change
+$1.74 (+3.19%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.81B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMIH
Price
$40.48
Change
+$1.76 (+4.55%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.98B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNF vs NMIH

Header iconFNF vs NMIH Comparison
Open Charts FNF vs NMIHBanner chart's image
Fidelity National Financial
Price$56.32
Change+$1.74 (+3.19%)
Volume$447
Capitalization14.81B
NMI Holdings
Price$40.48
Change+$1.76 (+4.55%)
Volume$200
Capitalization2.98B
FNF vs NMIH Comparison Chart in %
FNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMIH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNF vs. NMIH commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNF is a StrongBuy and NMIH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FNF: $54.58 vs. NMIH: $38.72)
Brand notoriety: FNF and NMIH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNF: 75% vs. NMIH: 179%
Market capitalization -- FNF: $14.81B vs. NMIH: $2.98B
FNF [@Specialty Insurance] is valued at $14.81B. NMIH’s [@Specialty Insurance] market capitalization is $2.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Insurance] industry ranges from $14.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Insurance] industry is $3.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMIH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMIH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the long-term than NMIH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMIH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMIH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNF is a better buy in the short-term than NMIH.

Price Growth

FNF (@Specialty Insurance) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while NMIH (@Specialty Insurance) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Insurance industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

NMIH is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Insurance (+1.98% weekly)

Specialty insurance typically caters to niche-markets, and covers items that are special or unique and/or items that are not typically covered under other insurance policies. Restoration or purchase of a one-of-a-kind collector’s item, high-value home, recreational vehicles, sailboat or even jet skis, horses and farms, all-terrain vehicle, funerals, museums and fine art collections are some examples– one or more of which are covered by a specialty insurance provider. In some cases, a specialty insurance could also complement someone’s existing auto, home and umbrella policies. Markel Corp, for Fidelity National Financial, Inc., Assurant, Inc. and Athene Holding Ltd. are examples of specialty insurance providers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNF($14.8B) has a higher market cap than NMIH($2.98B). FNF has higher P/E ratio than NMIH: FNF (12.78) vs NMIH (8.09). FNF YTD gains are higher at: -0.018 vs. NMIH (-5.075). NMIH has less debt than FNF: NMIH (417M) vs FNF (4.77B). FNF has higher revenues than NMIH: FNF (13.7B) vs NMIH (692M).
FNFNMIHFNF / NMIH
Capitalization14.8B2.98B497%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.018-5.0750%
P/E Ratio12.788.09158%
Revenue13.7B692M1,980%
Total CashN/A506M-
Total Debt4.77B417M1,144%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNF vs NMIH: Fundamental Ratings
FNF
NMIH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
767
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3438
SMR RATING
1..100
9559
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5658
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNF's Valuation (27) in the Specialty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMIH (88) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMIH’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as NMIH (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to NMIH’s over the last 12 months.

NMIH's SMR Rating (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNF (95) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that NMIH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as NMIH (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FNF’s stock grew similarly to NMIH’s over the last 12 months.

NMIH's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FNF (89) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that NMIH’s stock grew similarly to FNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNFNMIH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMIH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVYA48.790.53
+1.10%
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
JADE69.500.32
+0.47%
JPMorgan Active Developing Mkts Eq ETF
GOVZ9.150.04
+0.38%
iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bd ETF
ACLO50.38N/A
N/A
TCW AAA CLO ETF
BUFD28.42-0.05
-0.18%
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF

FNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNF has been closely correlated with FAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNF jumps, then FAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNF
1D Price
Change %
FNF100%
-1.02%
FAF - FNF
79%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
NMIH - FNF
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
ACT - FNF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
MTG - FNF
60%
Loosely correlated
-5.19%
AGO - FNF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More

NMIH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMIH has been closely correlated with MTG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMIH jumps, then MTG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMIH
1D Price
Change %
NMIH100%
-1.33%
MTG - NMIH
86%
Closely correlated
-5.19%
ACT - NMIH
75%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
RDN - NMIH
74%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
ESNT - NMIH
70%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
FNF - NMIH
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
More