Intraday BUY SELL Signals
20 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs SAN
FNDF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs SAN
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$47.19
Change+$0.03 (+0.06%)
Volume$4.76K
Net Assets20.37B
Banco Santander SA
Price$12.26
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Volume$14.03K
Capitalization179.38B
FNDF vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. SAN commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and SAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN: Fundamental Ratings
SAN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 77% | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||
SAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| BBVA - SAN | 80% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| BCS - SAN | 72% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| ING - SAN | 71% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| HSBC - SAN | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MUFG - SAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.83% | ||
More | ||||