Intraday BUY SELL Signals
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs SAN
FNDF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs SAN
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$44.79
Change-$0.39 (-0.86%)
Volume$3.69K
Net Assets18.84B
Banco Santander SA
Price$10.93
Change-$0.10 (-0.91%)
Volume$17.21K
Capitalization163.1B
FNDF vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. SAN commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Buy and SAN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN: Fundamental Ratings
SAN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 21 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.67% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||
SAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN | 100% | +2.41% | ||
| BBVA - SAN | 80% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| ING - SAN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| BCS - SAN | 69% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| HSBC - SAN | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| MUFG - SAN | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||