Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs SAN
FNDF vs SAN Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs SAN
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$49.55
Change+$0.22 (+0.45%)
Volume$1.67K
Net Assets21.45B
Banco Santander SA
Price$12.38
Change+$0.15 (+1.23%)
Volume$10.75K
Capitalization192.11B
FNDF vs SAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. SAN commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a StrongBuy and SAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAN: Fundamental Ratings
SAN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | SAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| MT - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
SAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAN has been closely correlated with BBVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAN jumps, then BBVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAN | 100% | -6.36% | ||
| BBVA - SAN | 81% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| BCS - SAN | 75% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| ING - SAN | 74% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| HSBC - SAN | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| MUFG - SAN | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||