Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs RODM
FNDF vs RODM Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODM
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$42.20
Change+$0.17 (+0.40%)
Volume$1.68M
Net Assets17.37B
Hartford Multifactor Dev Mkts (exUS) ETF
Price$35.48
Change+$0.11 (+0.31%)
Volume$69.97K
Net Assets1.22B
FNDF vs RODM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODM commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and RODM is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 17.4B vs. RODM (1.22B). FNDF (27.758) and RODM (27.202) have matching annual dividend yield . FNDF was incepted earlier than RODM: FNDF (12 years) vs RODM (11 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODM (0.29). RODM has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | RODM | FNDF / RODM | |
| Gain YTD | 27.758 | 27.202 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 1.22B | 1,425% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 61.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 2.92 | 3.44 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MT - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BBVA - FNDF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| MFC - FNDF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
RODM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODM has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RODM jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODM | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| SAN - RODM | 68% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MFC - RODM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| NWG - RODM | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| RY - RODM | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SAP - RODM | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||