Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs RODE
FNDF vs RODE Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODE
FNDF vs RODE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODE commentary
Jul 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and RODE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.4B vs. RODE (16.6M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than RODE: FNDF (22.037) vs RODE (2.938). FNDF was incepted earlier than RODE: FNDF (12 years) vs RODE (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODE (0.29). RODE has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | RODE | FNDF / RODE | |
| Gain YTD | 22.037 | 2.938 | 750% |
| Net Assets | 16.4B | 16.6M | 98,795% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 54.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 3.07 | 5.43 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with BNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then BNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| BMO - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| RY - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
RODE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODE has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RODE jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODE | 100% | N/A | ||
| NWG - RODE | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| WDS - RODE | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
| SAP - RODE | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| SHEL - RODE | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| OTEX - RODE | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
More | ||||