Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$42.20
Change+$0.17 (+0.40%)
Volume$1.68M
Net Assets17.37B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$35.84
Change+$0.15 (+0.42%)
Volume$68.37K
Net Assets1.24B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 17.4B vs. ICOW (1.24B). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than ICOW: FNDF (27.758) vs ICOW (25.293). FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than ICOW (0.65). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 27.758 | 25.293 | 110% |
| Net Assets | 17.4B | 1.24B | 1,400% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.65 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 79.00 | 15% |
| Yield | 2.92 | 2.07 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| MT - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BBVA - FNDF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| MFC - FNDF | 66% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| MT - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 68% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 67% Closely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
More | ||||