Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs ICOW
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs ICOW
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$39.57
Change-$0.38 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.28M
Net Assets16.11B
Pacer Dev Mkts Intl Csh Cows 100 ETF
Price$34.00
Change-$0.12 (-0.35%)
Volume$79.41K
Net Assets1.14B
FNDF vs ICOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. ICOW commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and ICOW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.1B vs. ICOW (1.14B). FNDF (19.151) and ICOW (18.246) have matching annual dividend yield . FNDF was incepted earlier than ICOW: FNDF (12 years) vs ICOW (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than ICOW (0.65). ICOW has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | ICOW | FNDF / ICOW | |
| Gain YTD | 19.151 | 18.246 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 16.1B | 1.14B | 1,414% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.65 | 38% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 67.00 | 18% |
| Yield | 3.41 | 4.44 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 80% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with BNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then BNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| BMO - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| RY - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||
ICOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICOW has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICOW jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOW | 100% | -0.35% | ||
| BHP - ICOW | 74% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| TTE - ICOW | 72% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| RIO - ICOW | 71% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| SHEL - ICOW | 70% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| WDS - ICOW | 69% Closely correlated | +5.43% | ||
More | ||||