Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs HDMV
FNDF vs HDMV Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs HDMV
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$49.32
Change+$6.11 (+14.14%)
Volume$2.05M
Net Assets21.45B
First Trust Hrzn MgdVolatil Dev Intl ETF
Price$37.16
Change+$2.84 (+8.28%)
Volume$3K
Net Assets16.76M
FNDF vs HDMV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. HDMV commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a StrongBuy and HDMV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 21.5B vs. HDMV (16.8M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than HDMV: FNDF (9.091) vs HDMV (5.172). FNDF was incepted earlier than HDMV: FNDF (12 years) vs HDMV (9 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than HDMV (0.80). HDMV has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | HDMV | FNDF / HDMV | |
| Gain YTD | 9.091 | 5.172 | 176% |
| Net Assets | 21.5B | 16.8M | 127,976% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.80 | 31% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 90.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 3.19 | 4.87 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | HDMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| SAN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| MT - FNDF | 69% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
HDMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HDMV has been loosely correlated with FER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HDMV jumps, then FER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HDMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HDMV | 100% | +0.55% | ||
| FER - HDMV | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ALC - HDMV | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| SHEL - HDMV | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| SW - HDMV | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
| TLX - HDMV | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.90% | ||
More | ||||