Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs ISVL
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs ISVL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.16
Change+$0.39 (+0.89%)
Volume$97.88K
Net Assets2.99B
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$44.39
Change+$0.26 (+0.59%)
Volume$30.55K
Net Assets48.63M
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. ISVL commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Hold and ISVL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.99B vs. ISVL (48.6M). ISVL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: ISVL (31.585) vs FNDC (29.958). FNDC was incepted earlier than ISVL: FNDC (12 years) vs ISVL (4 years). ISVL (0.31) has a lower expense ratio than FNDC (0.39). ISVL has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | ISVL | FNDC / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | 29.958 | 31.585 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 48.6M | 6,160% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 63.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 2.64 | 3.18 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KBUF | 32.63 | 0.23 | +0.72% |
| KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF | |||
| RFV | 131.33 | 0.58 | +0.45% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | |||
| QQQG | 22.86 | 0.05 | +0.21% |
| Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Csh CwsGrLdrsETF | |||
| EVV | 10.36 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
| Eaton Vance Limited | |||
| SPVM | 64.51 | -0.14 | -0.21% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | |||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 69% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| BIPC - FNDC | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| DOV - FNDC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and ALM have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| ALM - ISVL | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.90% | ||
| LAND - ISVL | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.55% | ||
| CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| SON - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| K - ISVL | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
More | ||||