Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs ISVL
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs ISVL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.45
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3B
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$45.05
Change-$0.16 (-0.35%)
Volume$200
Net Assets67.84M
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. ISVL commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Buy and ISVL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3B vs. ISVL (67.8M). ISVL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: ISVL (33.994) vs FNDC (30.959). FNDC was incepted earlier than ISVL: FNDC (12 years) vs ISVL (5 years). ISVL (0.31) has a lower expense ratio than FNDC (0.39). ISVL has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | ISVL | FNDC / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | 30.959 | 33.994 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 3B | 67.8M | 4,426% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 63.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 2.61 | 3.12 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.50% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and SMR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and SMR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| SMR - ISVL | 28% Poorly correlated | -10.82% | ||
| ALM - ISVL | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| LAND - ISVL | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
| SON - ISVL | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.18% | ||
| CIX - ISVL | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||