Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs ISVL
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs ISVL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.32
Change+$0.24 (+0.54%)
Volume$90.37K
Net Assets3B
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
Price$44.94
Change+$0.52 (+1.17%)
Volume$20.28K
Net Assets53.66M
FNDC vs ISVL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. ISVL commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a StrongBuy and ISVL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3B vs. ISVL (53.7M). ISVL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: ISVL (33.200) vs FNDC (30.429). FNDC was incepted earlier than ISVL: FNDC (12 years) vs ISVL (5 years). ISVL (0.31) has a lower expense ratio than FNDC (0.39). ISVL has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | ISVL | FNDC / ISVL | |
| Gain YTD | 30.429 | 33.200 | 92% |
| Net Assets | 3B | 53.7M | 5,579% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.31 | 126% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 63.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 2.64 | 3.18 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | ISVL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 84% | 13 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| ATS - FNDC | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| BIPC - FNDC | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
More | ||||
ISVL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ISVL and ALM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ISVL and ALM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ISVL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISVL | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| ALM - ISVL | 29% Poorly correlated | +4.96% | ||
| LAND - ISVL | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SON - ISVL | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| CELC - ISVL | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.58% | ||
| CIX - ISVL | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
More | ||||