Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs GVAL
FNDC vs GVAL Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs GVAL
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.45
Change-$0.04 (-0.09%)
Volume$200
Net Assets3B
Cambria Global Value ETF
Price$30.95
Change-$0.22 (-0.71%)
Volume$83.84K
Net Assets365.72M
FNDC vs GVAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. GVAL commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Buy and GVAL is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3B vs. GVAL (366M). GVAL has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: GVAL (53.119) vs FNDC (30.959). FNDC was incepted earlier than GVAL: FNDC (12 years) vs GVAL (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than GVAL (0.66). FNDC has a higher turnover GVAL (8.00) vs GVAL (8.00).
| FNDC | GVAL | FNDC / GVAL | |
| Gain YTD | 30.959 | 53.119 | 58% |
| Net Assets | 3B | 366M | 820% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.66 | 59% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 8.00 | 413% |
| Yield | 2.61 | 2.23 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | GVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 66% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.50% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
GVAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVAL has been loosely correlated with FER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVAL jumps, then FER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVAL | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| FER - GVAL | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| SAN - GVAL | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.41% | ||
| BBVA - GVAL | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| RIO - GVAL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| SHEL - GVAL | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||