Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs FYLD
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs FYLD
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$42.35
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
Volume$125.78K
Net Assets2.96B
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$29.59
Change+$0.17 (+0.58%)
Volume$30.52K
Net Assets401.34M
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. FYLD commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Hold and FYLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.96B vs. FYLD (401M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than FYLD: FNDC (24.632) vs FYLD (19.373). FNDC was incepted earlier than FYLD: FNDC (12 years) vs FYLD (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | FYLD | FNDC / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 24.632 | 19.373 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 2.96B | 401M | 738% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.59 | 66% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 44.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 2.76 | 3.06 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 71% Closely correlated | +2.52% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| BEN - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| RIO - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| APAM - FYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||