Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs FYLD
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs FYLD
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$43.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$127.1K
Net Assets2.99B
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$30.33
Change-$0.12 (-0.39%)
Volume$43.55K
Net Assets421.42M
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. FYLD commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Buy and FYLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.99B vs. FYLD (421M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than FYLD: FNDC (26.780) vs FYLD (22.358). FNDC was incepted earlier than FYLD: FNDC (12 years) vs FYLD (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | FYLD | FNDC / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 26.780 | 22.358 | 120% |
| Net Assets | 2.99B | 421M | 710% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.59 | 66% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 44.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 2.76 | 3.06 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.07% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 69% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| BEN - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 70% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| RIO - FYLD | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| APAM - FYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||