38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FNDB vs META
FNDB vs META Comparison
Open Charts FNDB vs META
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market ETF
Price$23.30
Change+$0.23 (+1.00%)
Volume$700
CapitalizationN/A
Meta Platforms
Price$584.59
Change-$10.98 (-1.84%)
Volume$630.1K
CapitalizationN/A
FNDB vs META Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDB vs. META commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDB is a Hold and META is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
META: Fundamental Ratings
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDB | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDB has been loosely correlated with WFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDB jumps, then WFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDB | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| WFC - FNDB | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| JPM - FNDB | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| AAPL - FNDB | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| META - FNDB | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| AMZN - FNDB | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with GOOG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then GOOG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| GOOG - META | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| OPRA - META | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| DASH - META | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| PINS - META | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||