Ad is loading...
FNDA vs SCHA
FNDA vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs SCHA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$28.44
Change+$0.20 (+0.71%)
Volume$529.65K
Net Assets8.28B
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$24.79
Change+$0.23 (+0.94%)
Volume$2.17M
Net Assets16.85B
FNDA vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. SCHA commentary
May 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Buy and SCHA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 16.9B vs. FNDA (8.28B). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDA: SCHA (-3.920) vs FNDA (-4.743). FNDA was incepted earlier than SCHA: FNDA (12 years) vs SCHA (16 years). SCHA (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FNDA (0.25). FNDA has a higher turnover SCHA (11.00) vs SCHA (11.00).
| FNDA | SCHA | FNDA / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | -4.743 | -3.920 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 8.28B | 16.9B | 49% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.04 | 625% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 11.00 | 236% |
| Yield | 1.63 | 1.72 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -7.20% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.06% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
More | ||||