92 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDA vs SATS
FNDA vs SATS Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs SATS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$29.24
Change-$0.08 (-0.27%)
Volume$774
Net Assets8.41B
EchoStar
Price$27.08
Change-$0.27 (-0.99%)
Volume$1.9M
Capitalization7.79B
FNDA vs SATS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. SATS commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Hold and SATS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SATS: Fundamental Ratings
SATS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | SATS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | N/A | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SATS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SATS has been loosely correlated with SMOPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SATS jumps, then SMOPF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATS | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| SMOPF - SATS | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ZBRA - SATS | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| TDS - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.25% | ||
| LILAK - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| COMM - SATS | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.94% | ||
More | ||||