75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FNDA vs SATS
FNDA vs SATS Comparison
Open Charts FNDA vs SATS
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
Price$28.43
Change+$0.19 (+0.67%)
Volume$866
Net Assets8.25B
EchoStar
Price$23.39
Change+$0.49 (+2.14%)
Volume$28.83K
Capitalization3.87B
FNDA vs SATS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDA vs. SATS commentary
May 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDA is a Buy and SATS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SATS: Fundamental Ratings
SATS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDA | SATS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDA has been loosely correlated with RCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNDA jumps, then RCL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDA | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| RCL - FNDA | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| AGO - FNDA | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| COIN - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | -7.20% | ||
| SATS - FNDA | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| XPO - FNDA | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||
SATS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SATS has been loosely correlated with SMOPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SATS jumps, then SMOPF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SATS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATS | 100% | +0.50% | ||
| SMOPF - SATS | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ZBRA - SATS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| BDC - SATS | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CSCO - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | +4.85% | ||
| GILT - SATS | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||