FND
Price
$75.30
Change
-$0.48 (-0.63%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
13.87B
32 days until earnings call
WOOF
Price
$2.83
Change
+$0.04 (+1.43%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
613.3M
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FND vs WOOF

Header iconFND vs WOOF Comparison
Open Charts FND vs WOOFBanner chart's image
Floor & Decor Holdings
Price$75.30
Change-$0.48 (-0.63%)
Volume$2.67M
Capitalization13.87B
Petco Health and Wellness
Price$2.83
Change+$0.04 (+1.43%)
Volume$3.98M
Capitalization613.3M
FND vs WOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FND vs. WOOF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FND is a Buy and WOOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FND: $75.30 vs. WOOF: $2.83)
Brand notoriety: FND and WOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FND: 126% vs. WOOF: 88%
Market capitalization -- FND: $13.87B vs. WOOF: $613.3M
FND [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $13.87B. WOOF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $613.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWOOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WOOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOOF is a better buy in the long-term than FND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FND’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FND’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WOOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WOOF is a better buy in the short-term than FND.

Price Growth

FND (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.48% price change this week, while WOOF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +7.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

FND is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

WOOF is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+2.51% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FND($13.9B) has a higher market cap than WOOF($613M). FND has higher P/E ratio than WOOF: FND (55.57) vs WOOF (26.88). FND (-24.473) and WOOF (-25.722) have similar YTD gains . FND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 523M vs. WOOF (377M). WOOF has more cash in the bank: 173M vs. FND (34.4M). FND has less debt than WOOF: FND (1.63B) vs WOOF (3.04B). WOOF has higher revenues than FND: WOOF (6.17B) vs FND (4.41B).
FNDWOOFFND / WOOF
Capitalization13.9B613M2,268%
EBITDA523M377M139%
Gain YTD-24.473-25.72295%
P/E Ratio55.5726.88207%
Revenue4.41B6.17B72%
Total Cash34.4M173M20%
Total Debt1.63B3.04B54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FND vs WOOF: Fundamental Ratings
FND
WOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1121
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
6991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6285
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7425
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WOOF's Valuation (53) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FND (67) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that WOOF’s stock grew similarly to FND’s over the last 12 months.

FND's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as WOOF (100) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FND’s stock grew similarly to WOOF’s over the last 12 months.

FND's SMR Rating (69) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as WOOF (91) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FND’s stock grew similarly to WOOF’s over the last 12 months.

FND's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as WOOF (85) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FND’s stock grew similarly to WOOF’s over the last 12 months.

WOOF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (74) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that WOOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNDWOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPUS117.600.24
+0.21%
JPMorgan Diversified Return US Eq ETF
PBFB28.48N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Feb
LFAU156.35N/A
N/A
LifeX 2058 Longevity Income ETF
XOP127.20-0.58
-0.45%
SPDR® S&P Oil & Gas Explor & Prodtn ETF
EMXF42.62-0.22
-0.51%
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF

FND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FND has been closely correlated with LOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FND jumps, then LOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FND
1D Price
Change %
FND100%
-0.63%
LOW - FND
69%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
WSM - FND
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
HD - FND
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
RH - FND
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
ASO - FND
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
More

WOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOOF has been loosely correlated with SBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOOF jumps, then SBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOOF
1D Price
Change %
WOOF100%
+1.43%
SBH - WOOF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
SAH - WOOF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
AAP - WOOF
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
DKS - WOOF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
FND - WOOF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
More