FND
Price
$99.71
Change
+$2.56 (+2.64%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.87B
34 days until earnings call
LOW
Price
$261.05
Change
+$2.27 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
145.75B
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FND vs LOW

Header iconFND vs LOW Comparison
Open Charts FND vs LOWBanner chart's image
Floor & Decor Holdings
Price$99.71
Change+$2.56 (+2.64%)
Volume$7.92K
Capitalization13.87B
Lowe's Companies
Price$261.05
Change+$2.27 (+0.88%)
Volume$29.84K
Capitalization145.75B
FND vs LOW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FND vs. LOW commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FND is a Hold and LOW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FND: $97.15 vs. LOW: $258.78)
Brand notoriety: FND: Not notable vs. LOW: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FND: 156% vs. LOW: 78%
Market capitalization -- FND: $13.87B vs. LOW: $145.75B
FND [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $13.87B. LOW’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $145.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOW’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • FND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOW’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than FND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FND’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FND’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the short-term than FND.

Price Growth

FND (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while LOW (@Specialty Stores) price change was +4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

FND is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

LOW is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.14% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than FND($13.9B). FND has higher P/E ratio than LOW: FND (55.57) vs LOW (18.88). LOW YTD gains are higher at: 4.854 vs. FND (-2.558). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. FND (523M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. FND (34.4M). FND has less debt than LOW: FND (1.63B) vs LOW (40.1B). LOW has higher revenues than FND: LOW (86.4B) vs FND (4.41B).
FNDLOWFND / LOW
Capitalization13.9B146B10%
EBITDA523M13.6B4%
Gain YTD-2.5584.854-53%
P/E Ratio55.5718.88294%
Revenue4.41B86.4B5%
Total Cash34.4M921M4%
Total Debt1.63B40.1B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FND vs LOW: Fundamental Ratings
FND
LOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5719
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5016
SMR RATING
1..100
718
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2730
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOW's Valuation (12) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (75). This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (50). This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's SMR Rating (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (71). This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as FND (60). This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to FND’s over the last 12 months.

FND's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as LOW (30). This means that FND’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNDLOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

FND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FND has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FND jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FND
1D Price
Change %
FND100%
-0.28%
RH - FND
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
TSCO - FND
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
KMX - FND
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
LOW - FND
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
ONEW - FND
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
+0.80%
HD - LOW
84%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
PAG - LOW
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
WSM - LOW
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
RUSHA - LOW
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
FND - LOW
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More