FND
Price
$78.63
Change
-$1.40 (-1.75%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
13.87B
11 days until earnings call
LOW
Price
$219.16
Change
+$0.58 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
145.75B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FND vs LOW

Header iconFND vs LOW Comparison
Open Charts FND vs LOWBanner chart's image
Floor & Decor Holdings
Price$78.63
Change-$1.40 (-1.75%)
Volume$1.3M
Capitalization13.87B
Lowe's Companies
Price$219.16
Change+$0.58 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.4M
Capitalization145.75B
FND vs LOW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FND vs. LOW commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FND is a Hold and LOW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FND: $78.63 vs. LOW: $219.16)
Brand notoriety: FND: Not notable vs. LOW: Notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FND: 71% vs. LOW: 89%
Market capitalization -- FND: $13.87B vs. LOW: $145.75B
FND [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $13.87B. LOW’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $145.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLOW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LOW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LOW is a better buy in the long-term than FND.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FND’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FND’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LOW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FND is a better buy in the short-term than LOW.

Price Growth

FND (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.59% price change this week, while LOW (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

FND is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.18% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOW($146B) has a higher market cap than FND($13.9B). FND has higher P/E ratio than LOW: FND (55.57) vs LOW (18.88). LOW YTD gains are higher at: -10.341 vs. FND (-21.133). LOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.6B vs. FND (523M). LOW has more cash in the bank: 921M vs. FND (34.4M). FND has less debt than LOW: FND (1.63B) vs LOW (40.1B). LOW has higher revenues than FND: LOW (86.4B) vs FND (4.41B).
FNDLOWFND / LOW
Capitalization13.9B146B10%
EBITDA523M13.6B4%
Gain YTD-21.133-10.341204%
P/E Ratio55.5718.88294%
Revenue4.41B86.4B5%
Total Cash34.4M921M4%
Total Debt1.63B40.1B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FND vs LOW: Fundamental Ratings
FND
LOW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6828
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7637
SMR RATING
1..100
708
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8523

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LOW's Valuation (2) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (67). This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (76). This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's SMR Rating (8) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (70). This means that LOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.

FND's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as LOW (59). This means that FND’s stock grew similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.

LOW's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as FND (61). This means that LOW’s stock grew similarly to FND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNDLOW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NLR117.131.60
+1.38%
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
WCLD36.040.26
+0.72%
WisdomTree Cloud Computing ETF
KLIP32.560.12
+0.38%
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF
QLVE27.890.03
+0.11%
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
RZC25.45-0.01
-0.04%
Reinsurance Group of America

FND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FND has been closely correlated with LOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FND jumps, then LOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FND
1D Price
Change %
FND100%
-1.75%
LOW - FND
70%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
RH - FND
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
WSM - FND
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
HD - FND
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
ASO - FND
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More

LOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOW
1D Price
Change %
LOW100%
+0.27%
HD - LOW
88%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
FND - LOW
70%
Closely correlated
-1.75%
ASO - LOW
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
PAG - LOW
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
WSM - LOW
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More