FNCTF
Price
$15.60
Change
-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
30.14B
TLSNF
Price
$3.59
Change
-$0.01 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
8.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCTF vs TLSNF

Header iconFNCTF vs TLSNF Comparison
Open Charts FNCTF vs TLSNFBanner chart's image
Orange
Price$15.60
Change-$0.10 (-0.64%)
Volume$1.59K
Capitalization30.14B
Telia Company AB
Price$3.59
Change-$0.01 (-0.28%)
Volume$502
Capitalization8.45B
FNCTF vs TLSNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCTF vs. TLSNF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCTF is a Hold and TLSNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCTF: $15.60 vs. TLSNF: $3.59)
Brand notoriety: FNCTF and TLSNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCTF: 23% vs. TLSNF: 56%
Market capitalization -- FNCTF: $30.14B vs. TLSNF: $8.45B
FNCTF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $30.14B. TLSNF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $8.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLSNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLSNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCTF is a better buy in the long-term than TLSNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLSNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TLSNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNCTF is a better buy in the short-term than TLSNF.

Price Growth

FNCTF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while TLSNF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.70% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCTF($30.1B) has a higher market cap than TLSNF($8.45B). TLSNF has higher P/E ratio than FNCTF: TLSNF (21.41) vs FNCTF (17.30). FNCTF YTD gains are higher at: 48.855 vs. TLSNF (25.524). TLSNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 28B vs. FNCTF (13.1B). FNCTF has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. TLSNF (7.24B). FNCTF has less debt than TLSNF: FNCTF (46.1B) vs TLSNF (63.8B). TLSNF has higher revenues than FNCTF: TLSNF (93.1B) vs FNCTF (43.7B).
FNCTFTLSNFFNCTF / TLSNF
Capitalization30.1B8.45B356%
EBITDA13.1B28B47%
Gain YTD48.85525.524191%
P/E Ratio17.3021.4181%
Revenue43.7B93.1B47%
Total Cash12.6B7.24B174%
Total Debt46.1B63.8B72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCTF vs TLSNF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCTF
TLSNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4192
SMR RATING
1..100
9960
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNCTF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNF (94). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNF (92). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNCTF (99). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNCTF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCTF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (52). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCTF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLSNF (100). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew significantly faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCTFTLSNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELDN3.080.02
+0.65%
Eledon Pharmaceuticals
MC65.800.31
+0.47%
Moelis & Company
MBBC9.99N/A
N/A
Marathon Bancorp Inc
PPG118.28-0.31
-0.26%
PPG Industries
AORT30.72-0.13
-0.42%
Artivion

FNCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCTF and TLSNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCTF and TLSNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCTF
1D Price
Change %
FNCTF100%
N/A
TLSNF - FNCTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKTTF - FNCTF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRPFF - FNCTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMUY - FNCTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNGR - FNCTF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
More

TLSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLSNF has been loosely correlated with RCIAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLSNF jumps, then RCIAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLSNF
1D Price
Change %
TLSNF100%
N/A
RCIAF - TLSNF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PTTWF - TLSNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCTF - TLSNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRAGF - TLSNF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAOF - TLSNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More