FNCTF
Price
$17.00
Change
+$0.50 (+3.03%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
44.63B
TLSNF
Price
$3.72
Change
+$0.22 (+6.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.46B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCTF vs TLSNF

Header iconFNCTF vs TLSNF Comparison
Open Charts FNCTF vs TLSNFBanner chart's image
Orange
Price$17.00
Change+$0.50 (+3.03%)
Volume$870
Capitalization44.63B
Telia Company AB
Price$3.72
Change+$0.22 (+6.29%)
Volume$869
Capitalization14.46B
FNCTF vs TLSNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCTF vs. TLSNF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCTF is a Hold and TLSNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCTF: $17.00 vs. TLSNF: $3.72)
Brand notoriety: FNCTF and TLSNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCTF: 11% vs. TLSNF: 80%
Market capitalization -- FNCTF: $44.63B vs. TLSNF: $14.46B
FNCTF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $44.63B. TLSNF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $14.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTLSNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TLSNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCTF is a better buy in the long-term than TLSNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLSNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TLSNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLSNF is a better buy in the short-term than FNCTF.

Price Growth

FNCTF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +4.62% price change this week, while TLSNF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCTF($44.6B) has a higher market cap than TLSNF($14.5B). FNCTF has higher P/E ratio than TLSNF: FNCTF (42.69) vs TLSNF (26.10). FNCTF YTD gains are higher at: 62.214 vs. TLSNF (30.070). TLSNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.1B vs. FNCTF (11.7B). FNCTF has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. TLSNF (9.78B). FNCTF has less debt than TLSNF: FNCTF (7.51B) vs TLSNF (90B). TLSNF has higher revenues than FNCTF: TLSNF (89.4B) vs FNCTF (40.3B).
FNCTFTLSNFFNCTF / TLSNF
Capitalization44.6B14.5B308%
EBITDA11.7B31.1B38%
Gain YTD62.21430.070207%
P/E Ratio42.6926.10164%
Revenue40.3B89.4B45%
Total Cash10.6B9.78B108%
Total Debt7.51B90B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCTF vs TLSNF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCTF
TLSNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5045
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3994
SMR RATING
1..100
9976
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNCTF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNF (94). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLSNF (94). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TLSNF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCTF (99). This means that TLSNF’s stock grew similarly to FNCTF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCTF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as TLSNF (45). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew similarly to TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCTF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLSNF (100). This means that FNCTF’s stock grew significantly faster than TLSNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCTFTLSNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLSNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HUM286.395.05
+1.79%
Humana
WHG17.950.28
+1.58%
Westwood Holdings Group
ARIS23.93-0.06
-0.25%
Aris Water Solutions
CNS74.93-1.70
-2.22%
Cohen & Steers
PULM4.71-0.31
-6.18%
Pulmatrix

FNCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCTF and TLSNF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCTF and TLSNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCTF
1D Price
Change %
FNCTF100%
+3.00%
TLSNF - FNCTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKTTF - FNCTF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRPFF - FNCTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMUY - FNCTF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNGR - FNCTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
More

TLSNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLSNF has been loosely correlated with RCIAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLSNF jumps, then RCIAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLSNF
1D Price
Change %
TLSNF100%
N/A
RCIAF - TLSNF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PTTWF - TLSNF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNCTF - TLSNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
TRAGF - TLSNF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIAOF - TLSNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More