FNCSF
Price
$5.37
Change
+$0.05 (+0.94%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
319.89M
JFHHF
Price
$1.73
Change
-$0.07 (-3.89%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
812.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCSF vs JFHHF

Header iconFNCSF vs JFHHF Comparison
Open Charts FNCSF vs JFHHFBanner chart's image
North American Financial 15 Split
Price$5.37
Change+$0.05 (+0.94%)
Volume$700
Capitalization319.89M
Jupiter Fund Management
Price$1.73
Change-$0.07 (-3.89%)
Volume$100
Capitalization812.69M
FNCSF vs JFHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCSF vs. JFHHF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCSF is a Hold and JFHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCSF: $5.37 vs. JFHHF: $1.73)
Brand notoriety: FNCSF and JFHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCSF: 52% vs. JFHHF: 3%
Market capitalization -- FNCSF: $319.89M vs. JFHHF: $812.69M
FNCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $319.89M. JFHHF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $812.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJFHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • JFHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCSF is a better buy in the long-term than JFHHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JFHHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • JFHHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JFHHF is a better buy in the short-term than FNCSF.

Price Growth

FNCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while JFHHF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.26% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JFHHF($813M) has a higher market cap than FNCSF($320M). JFHHF has higher P/E ratio than FNCSF: JFHHF (11.92) vs FNCSF (2.68). JFHHF YTD gains are higher at: 66.667 vs. FNCSF (7.400).
FNCSFJFHHFFNCSF / JFHHF
Capitalization320M813M39%
EBITDAN/A89.1M-
Gain YTD7.40066.66711%
P/E Ratio2.6811.9223%
RevenueN/A381M-
Total CashN/A413M-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCSF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
36

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCSFJFHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JFHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GURAX32.580.31
+0.96%
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate A
RGEAX11.24N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Global Equity A
EQNUX23.41-0.02
-0.09%
MFS Equity Income R4
MUNDX27.94-0.03
-0.11%
Mundoval
FLACX84.98-0.22
-0.26%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel C

FNCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNCSF has been loosely correlated with JFHHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNCSF jumps, then JFHHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCSF
1D Price
Change %
FNCSF100%
+0.94%
JFHHF - FNCSF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GBLBF - FNCSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGIFF - FNCSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHNWF - FNCSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JBARF - FNCSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JFHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JFHHF has been loosely correlated with FNCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JFHHF jumps, then FNCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JFHHF
1D Price
Change %
JFHHF100%
N/A
FNCSF - JFHHF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
ELRNF - JFHHF
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.74%
GBLBF - JFHHF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STEP - JFHHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
WNMLA - JFHHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More