Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGEBX
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGEBX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$275.14
Change-$1.09 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FNCMX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FNCMX (20.6B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FNCMX (0.55) vs RGEBX (0.00). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FNCMX (22 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.30). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FNCMX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.63 vs. RGEBX (13.85). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 104.48 vs. RGEBX (40.64).
| FNCMX | RGEBX | FNCMX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 1.09 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.09 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.408 | 13.942 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.6B | 329B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.63 | 13.85 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.59 | 40.38 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.48 | 40.64 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 324.98 | 79.50 | 409% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement