Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs RGACX
FNCMX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs RGACX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$276.31
Change-$0.07 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FNCMX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FNCMX (20.9B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FNCMX (0.54) vs RGACX (0.07). FNCMX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FNCMX (22 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.30). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FNCMX (0) vs RGACX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.49 vs. RGACX (17.83). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 99.90 vs. RGACX (40.02).
| FNCMX | RGACX | FNCMX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.94 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.886 | 15.516 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.9B | 332B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.07 | 761% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.49 | 17.83 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.88 | 58.53 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.90 | 40.02 | 250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 348.61 | 95.93 | 363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement