Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs GFFFX
FNCMX vs GFFFX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs GFFFX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$276.31
Change-$0.07 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F2
Price$85.79
Change+$0.89 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
FNCMX vs GFFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. GFFFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a Buy and GFFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFFFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FNCMX (20.9B). FNCMX pays higher dividends than GFFFX: FNCMX (0.54) vs GFFFX (0.51). FNCMX was incepted earlier than GFFFX: FNCMX (22 years) vs GFFFX (17 years). GFFFX (0.40) is less costly to investors than FNCMX (0.30). GFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFFFX: FNCMX (0) vs GFFFX (250). FNCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.49 vs. GFFFX (18.73). FNCMX return over 5 years is better than : 99.90 vs. GFFFX (43.50).
| FNCMX | GFFFX | FNCMX / GFFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.40 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.40 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.886 | 15.936 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 20.9B | 332B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.49 | 18.73 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.88 | 60.96 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.90 | 43.50 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 348.61 | 101.61 | 343% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement