FNCHF vs LIQQF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCHF is a Hold and LIQQF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIQQF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FNCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LIQQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
FNCHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +23.22% price change this week, while LIQQF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +5.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.56%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+5.32% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FNCHF | LIQQF | FNCHF / LIQQF | |
| Capitalization | 497M | 1.83M | 27,188% |
| EBITDA | -15.36M | -3.52M | 436% |
| Gain YTD | 21.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 123M | 1.8M | 6,822% |
| Total Cash | 44.3M | 15.3M | 290% |
| Total Debt | 4.56M | 7.57K | 60,270% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
FNCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNCHF has been loosely correlated with LIQQF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNCHF jumps, then LIQQF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNCHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LIQQF - FNCHF | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CRVW - FNCHF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GDRX - FNCHF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
| IFBD - FNCHF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
| DUOT - FNCHF | 29% Poorly correlated | +6.84% | ||
More | ||||
LIQQF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIQQF has been loosely correlated with FNCHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIQQF jumps, then FNCHF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIQQF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIQQF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FNCHF - LIQQF | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NWKLF - LIQQF | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DOTDF - LIQQF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AKAFF - LIQQF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GB - LIQQF | 25% Poorly correlated | +4.77% | ||
More | ||||