FNCHF
Price
$1.26
Change
+$0.05 (+4.13%)
Updated
Mar 20 closing price
Capitalization
497.28M
IFBD
Price
$1.47
Change
+$0.04 (+2.80%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.75M
Ad is loading...

FNCHF vs IFBD

Header iconFNCHF vs IFBD Comparison
Open Charts FNCHF vs IFBDBanner chart's image
FINEOS
Price$1.26
Change+$0.05 (+4.13%)
Volume$5.7K
Capitalization497.28M
Infobird
Price$1.47
Change+$0.04 (+2.80%)
Volume$4.35K
Capitalization5.75M
FNCHF vs IFBD Comparison Chart
Loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCHF vs. IFBD commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCHF is a Hold and IFBD is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCHF: $1.26 vs. IFBD: $1.43)
Brand notoriety: FNCHF and IFBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCHF: 230% vs. IFBD: 34%
Market capitalization -- FNCHF: $497.28M vs. IFBD: $5.75M
FNCHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $497.28M. IFBD’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $5.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIFBD’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IFBD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNCHF is a better buy in the long-term than IFBD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IFBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • IFBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FNCHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IFBD (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

IFBD is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.38% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNCHF($497M) has a higher market cap than IFBD($5.75M). FNCHF YTD gains are higher at: 4.132 vs. IFBD (-36.726). IFBD (-14.72M) and FNCHF (-15.36M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FNCHF has more cash in the bank: 44.3M vs. IFBD (3.39K). IFBD has less debt than FNCHF: IFBD (3.62M) vs FNCHF (4.56M). FNCHF has higher revenues than IFBD: FNCHF (123M) vs IFBD (5.51M).
FNCHFIFBDFNCHF / IFBD
Capitalization497M5.75M8,648%
EBITDA-15.36M-14.72M104%
Gain YTD4.132-36.726-11%
P/E RatioN/A6.69-
Revenue123M5.51M2,234%
Total Cash44.3M3.39K1,306,785%
Total Debt4.56M3.62M126%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IFBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
IFBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X83102.830000617.109400
+0.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY536.70-27.82
-4.93%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA267.28-15.48
-5.47%
Tesla
GME21.10-1.59
-7.01%
GameStop Corp
AAPL203.19-20.70
-9.25%
Apple

FNCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCHF and GDRX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCHF and GDRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCHF
1D Price
Change %
FNCHF100%
N/A
GDRX - FNCHF
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.13%
IFBD - FNCHF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
DUOT - FNCHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.02%
FORA - FNCHF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
BYSD - FNCHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IFBD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFBD and MRIN have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFBD and MRIN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFBD
1D Price
Change %
IFBD100%
-3.38%
MRIN - IFBD
32%
Poorly correlated
-10.45%
FNCHF - IFBD
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMNSF - IFBD
27%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
BMR - IFBD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
ASUR - IFBD
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.73%
More