Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCFX vs RLBFX
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FNCFX vs RLBFX
Franklin Income R6
Price$2.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.46B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.15
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FNCFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FNCFX (76.5B). FNCFX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: FNCFX (5.49) vs RLBFX (1.97). FNCFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FNCFX (13 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FNCFX (0.42) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). FNCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.72 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCFX: RLBFX (250) vs FNCFX (1000000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. FNCFX (8.92). FNCFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.91 vs. RLBFX (43.06).
| FNCFX | RLBFX | FNCFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.29 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.42 | 0.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.716 | 16.507 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 76.5B | 269B | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.49 | 1.97 | 279% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.92 | 10.28 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.04 | 44.74 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.91 | 43.06 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.69 | 81.39 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement