FNBT
Price
$37.60
Change
+$1.10 (+3.01%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
461.93M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$26.43
Change
+$0.22 (+0.84%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.97B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNBT vs RF

Header iconFNBT vs RF Comparison
Open Charts FNBT vs RFBanner chart's image
FineMark Holdings
Price$37.60
Change+$1.10 (+3.01%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization461.93M
Regions Financial
Price$26.43
Change+$0.22 (+0.84%)
Volume$56.77K
Capitalization22.97B
FNBT vs RF Comparison Chart in %
FNBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNBT vs. RF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBT is a StrongBuy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FNBT: $37.60 vs. RF: $26.20)
Brand notoriety: FNBT: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNBT: 11% vs. RF: 45%
Market capitalization -- FNBT: $461.93M vs. RF: $22.97B
FNBT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $461.93M. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNBT is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNBT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNBT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the short-term than FNBT.

Price Growth

FNBT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.62% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.28% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($23B) has a higher market cap than FNBT($462M). FNBT has higher P/E ratio than RF: FNBT (156.67) vs RF (11.54). FNBT YTD gains are higher at: 41.620 vs. RF (15.023). FNBT has less debt than RF: FNBT (392M) vs RF (5.28B). RF has higher revenues than FNBT: RF (7.29B) vs FNBT (85.3M).
FNBTRFFNBT / RF
Capitalization462M23B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.62015.023277%
P/E Ratio156.6711.541,357%
Revenue85.3M7.29B1%
Total CashN/A3.25B-
Total Debt392M5.28B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNBT vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
FNBT
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4128
SMR RATING
1..100
817
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (73) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNBT (100) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNBT (41) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNBT (81) in the null industry. This means that RF’s stock grew significantly faster than FNBT’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RF (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNBT’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

FNBT's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBTRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUMG47.410.35
+0.74%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF
SEPU29.030.10
+0.35%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncSepETF
EUDV51.69N/A
N/A
ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Gr ETF
CMU3.48-0.01
-0.43%
MFS High Yield Municipal Trust
SQQQ67.03-0.47
-0.70%
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ

FNBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNBT and RF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNBT and RF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNBT
1D Price
Change %
FNBT100%
+3.01%
RF - FNBT
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.11%
VBNK - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.89%
MCHT - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFB - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
CFR - FNBT
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.15%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+3.11%
FITB - RF
80%
Closely correlated
+2.74%
HBAN - RF
79%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
PNC - RF
78%
Closely correlated
+3.10%
MTB - RF
77%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
FNB - RF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
More