FNB
Price
$13.84
Change
-$0.09 (-0.65%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
52 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$52.76
Change
-$0.18 (-0.34%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs WSFS

Header iconFNB vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs WSFSBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$13.84
Change-$0.09 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.81M
Capitalization4.97B
WSFS Financial
Price$52.76
Change-$0.18 (-0.34%)
Volume$288.94K
Capitalization2.71B
FNB vs WSFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. WSFS commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a Hold and WSFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FNB: $13.93 vs. WSFS: $52.94)
Brand notoriety: FNB and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 86% vs. WSFS: 138%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $4.97B vs. WSFS: $2.71B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.97B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WSFS is a better buy in the long-term than FNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FNB and WSFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.95% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($4.97B) has a higher market cap than WSFS($2.71B). FNB (10.55) and WSFS (10.04) have similar P/E ratio . WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 0.211 vs. FNB (-4.983). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 606M vs. FNB (447M). WSFS has less debt than FNB: WSFS (895M) vs FNB (3.98B). FNB has higher revenues than WSFS: FNB (1.57B) vs WSFS (1.02B).
FNBWSFSFNB / WSFS
Capitalization4.97B2.71B183%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.9830.211-2,363%
P/E Ratio10.5510.04105%
Revenue1.57B1.02B155%
Total Cash447M606M74%
Total Debt3.98B895M445%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
707
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2935
SMR RATING
1..100
1011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (63) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (35) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (11) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME30.862.81
+10.02%
GameStop Corp
TSLA341.046.42
+1.92%
Tesla
BTC.X111673.2800001995.203100
+1.82%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY583.090.23
+0.04%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL201.36-0.73
-0.36%
Apple

FNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNB
1D Price
Change %
FNB100%
+0.80%
WTFC - FNB
94%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
ASB - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
N/A
SNV - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
HWC - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
FULT - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
-0.26%
SBCF - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
-0.36%
HWC - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
UCB - WSFS
91%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
UBSI - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
FNB - WSFS
90%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
More