FNB
Price
$18.29
Change
+$2.34 (+14.67%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.54B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SBCF
Price
$34.16
Change
+$2.86 (+9.14%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.35B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNB vs SBCF

Header iconFNB vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs SBCFBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$18.29
Change+$2.34 (+14.67%)
Volume$7.66M
Capitalization6.54B
Seacoast Banking
Price$34.16
Change+$2.86 (+9.14%)
Volume$1.33M
Capitalization3.35B
FNB vs SBCF Comparison Chart in %
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. SBCF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a Buy and SBCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FNB: $18.29 vs. SBCF: $34.16)
Brand notoriety: FNB and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 144% vs. SBCF: 177%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $6.54B vs. SBCF: $3.35B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.54B. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $161.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.93% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNB($6.54B) has a higher market cap than SBCF($3.35B). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than FNB: SBCF (21.76) vs FNB (11.72). SBCF YTD gains are higher at: 8.721 vs. FNB (6.959). FNB has more cash in the bank: 535M vs. SBCF (174M). SBCF has less debt than FNB: SBCF (797M) vs FNB (3.1B). FNB has higher revenues than SBCF: FNB (1.68B) vs SBCF (582M).
FNBSBCFFNB / SBCF
Capitalization6.54B3.35B195%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.9598.72180%
P/E Ratio11.7221.7654%
Revenue1.68B582M289%
Total Cash535M174M307%
Total Debt3.1B797M388%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
915
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3078
SMR RATING
1..100
1118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5439
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (66) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (79). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (78). This means that FNB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (18). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (48). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (54). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SBCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLDRX57.231.85
+3.34%
BNY Mellon Natural Resources I
FAGCX232.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Growth Opps I
IYSAX18.93N/A
N/A
Nomura Smid Cap Core A
MEFNX7.26-0.07
-0.95%
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth R3
COMZX27.78-0.79
-2.77%
DWS Digital Horizons Inst

FNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNB
1D Price
Change %
FNB100%
+2.52%
WTFC - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
WBS - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
+9.02%
ONB - FNB
93%
Closely correlated
+1.97%
ASB - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
UCB - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
+2.31%
ABCB - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
+3.84%
TRMK - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
UBSI - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
+2.11%
FNB - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
UCB - SBCF
88%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
More