Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs MLOZX
FNARX vs MLOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. MLOZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and MLOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. MLOZX (119M). FNARX pays higher dividends than MLOZX: FNARX (1.69) vs MLOZX (1.53). FNARX was incepted earlier than MLOZX: FNARX (29 years) vs MLOZX (12 years). MLOZX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). MLOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 220.00 vs. FNARX (68.00). FNARX (0) and MLOZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.87 vs. MLOZX (31.82). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 196.75 vs. MLOZX (160.73).
| FNARX | MLOZX | FNARX / MLOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.90 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.30 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.007 | 13.932 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 119M | 694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.53 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.87 | 31.82 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.40 | 61.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 196.75 | 160.73 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.90 | 206.27 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement