Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs IEFCX
FNARX vs IEFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. IEFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and IEFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. IEFCX (505M). FNARX pays higher dividends than IEFCX: FNARX (1.69) vs IEFCX (1.50). FNARX was incepted earlier than IEFCX: FNARX (29 years) vs IEFCX (26 years). IEFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. IEFCX (23.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than IEFCX: FNARX (0) vs IEFCX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.87 vs. IEFCX (22.59). FNARX (196.75) and IEFCX (190.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNARX | IEFCX | FNARX / IEFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.98 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.98 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.007 | 13.502 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 505M | 164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.50 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.87 | 22.59 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.40 | 33.88 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 196.75 | 190.38 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.90 | 90.37 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers