Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs ICWIX
FNARX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. ICWIX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a StrongBuy and ICWIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 690M vs. ICWIX (150M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FNARX (1.31) vs ICWIX (1.02). FNARX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FNARX (29 years) vs ICWIX (9 years). ICWIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. ICWIX (63.34). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FNARX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.07 vs. ICWIX (15.10). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 185.43 vs. ICWIX (159.26).
| FNARX | ICWIX | FNARX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.10 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.931 | 21.860 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 690M | 150M | 460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.02 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.07 | 15.10 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.31 | 33.67 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 185.43 | 159.26 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement