Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs ICWIX
FNARX vs ICWIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. ICWIX commentary
Feb 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and ICWIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. ICWIX (175M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ICWIX: FNARX (1.69) vs ICWIX (0.99). FNARX was incepted earlier than ICWIX: FNARX (29 years) vs ICWIX (10 years). ICWIX (1.00) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. ICWIX (63.34). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICWIX: FNARX (0) vs ICWIX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.56 vs. ICWIX (28.78). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 197.85 vs. ICWIX (143.96).
| FNARX | ICWIX | FNARX / ICWIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.00 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.388 | 14.056 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 175M | 472% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.99 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.56 | 28.78 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.46 | 54.93 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 197.85 | 143.96 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 222.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers