Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs ICPAX
FNARX vs ICPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. ICPAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and ICPAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. ICPAX (170M). FNARX pays higher dividends than ICPAX: FNARX (1.69) vs ICPAX (0.55). FNARX was incepted earlier than ICPAX: FNARX (29 years) vs ICPAX (27 years). ICPAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. ICPAX (63.34). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICPAX: FNARX (0) vs ICPAX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.87 vs. ICPAX (25.12). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 196.75 vs. ICPAX (133.91).
| FNARX | ICPAX | FNARX / ICPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.50 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.50 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.007 | 11.159 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 170M | 486% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.55 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.87 | 25.12 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.40 | 51.89 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 196.75 | 133.91 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.90 | 117.14 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement