Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a StrongBuy and FSTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 690M vs. FSTEX (438M). FSTEX pays higher dividends than FNARX: FSTEX (3.55) vs FNARX (1.31). FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (29 years) vs FSTEX (42 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FSTEX (23.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.96 vs. FSTEX (10.58). FNARX (179.37) and FSTEX (175.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.835 | 8.867 | 325% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 690M | 438M | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 3.55 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.96 | 10.58 | 274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.88 | 15.81 | 271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 179.37 | 175.24 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.55 | 53.92 | 264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers