Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNARX vs FSTEX
FNARX vs FSTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNARX vs. FSTEX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNARX is a Hold and FSTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. FSTEX (505M). FSTEX pays higher dividends than FNARX: FSTEX (1.98) vs FNARX (1.69). FNARX was incepted earlier than FSTEX: FNARX (29 years) vs FSTEX (42 years). FSTEX (1.23) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FSTEX (23.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTEX: FNARX (0) vs FSTEX (1000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.87 vs. FSTEX (23.52). FSTEX (201.38) and FNARX (196.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNARX | FSTEX | FNARX / FSTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.23 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.007 | 13.581 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 505M | 164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.98 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.87 | 23.52 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.40 | 36.85 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 196.75 | 201.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 202.90 | 103.66 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement