FN
Price
$221.90
Change
-$8.77 (-3.80%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.99B
79 days until earnings call
PLXS
Price
$137.34
Change
-$2.32 (-1.66%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.71B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FN vs PLXS

Header iconFN vs PLXS Comparison
Open Charts FN vs PLXSBanner chart's image
Fabrinet
Price$221.90
Change-$8.77 (-3.80%)
Volume$495.67K
Capitalization7.99B
Plexus
Price$137.34
Change-$2.32 (-1.66%)
Volume$136.22K
Capitalization3.71B
FN vs PLXS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FN vs. PLXS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a Buy and PLXS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FN: $240.82 vs. PLXS: $139.09)
Brand notoriety: FN and PLXS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 151% vs. PLXS: 85%
Market capitalization -- FN: $7.99B vs. PLXS: $3.71B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $7.99B. PLXS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $3.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $83.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePLXS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PLXS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FN and PLXS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLXS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PLXS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLXS is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +16.29% price change this week, while PLXS (@Electronic Components) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

PLXS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-1.19% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FN($7.99B) has a higher market cap than PLXS($3.71B). PLXS has higher P/E ratio than FN: PLXS (31.84) vs FN (24.82). FN YTD gains are higher at: 9.523 vs. PLXS (-11.116). FN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 395M vs. PLXS (241M). FN has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. PLXS (317M). FN has less debt than PLXS: FN (6.09M) vs PLXS (246M). PLXS has higher revenues than FN: PLXS (3.95B) vs FN (3.12B).
FNPLXSFN / PLXS
Capitalization7.99B3.71B215%
EBITDA395M241M164%
Gain YTD9.523-11.116-86%
P/E Ratio24.8231.8478%
Revenue3.12B3.95B79%
Total Cash935M317M295%
Total Debt6.09M246M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs PLXS: Fundamental Ratings
FN
PLXS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1456
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1024
SMR RATING
1..100
4973
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PLXS's Valuation (63) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (69). This means that PLXS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (24). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (73). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PLXS (59). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to PLXS’s over the last 12 months.

PLXS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (54). This means that PLXS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNPLXS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLXS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been loosely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
+7.97%
CLS - FN
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
APH - FN
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
FLEX - FN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
KN - FN
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
PLXS - FN
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

PLXS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLXS has been closely correlated with SANM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PLXS jumps, then SANM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLXS
1D Price
Change %
PLXS100%
-0.08%
SANM - PLXS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
KN - PLXS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
FLEX - PLXS
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
BHE - PLXS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
ROG - PLXS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More