FN
Price
$409.90
Change
-$2.56 (-0.62%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.65B
22 days until earnings call
OMRNY
Price
$28.38
Change
+$0.07 (+0.25%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.51B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN vs OMRNY

Header iconFN vs OMRNY Comparison
Open Charts FN vs OMRNYBanner chart's image
Fabrinet
Price$409.90
Change-$2.56 (-0.62%)
Volume$477.81K
Capitalization14.65B
OMRON
Price$28.38
Change+$0.07 (+0.25%)
Volume$28.03K
Capitalization5.51B
FN vs OMRNY Comparison Chart in %
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMRNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FN vs. OMRNY commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a Hold and OMRNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FN: $409.90 vs. OMRNY: $28.38)
Brand notoriety: FN and OMRNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 67% vs. OMRNY: 66%
Market capitalization -- FN: $14.65B vs. OMRNY: $5.51B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $14.65B. OMRNY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $5.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $153.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMRNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMRNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than OMRNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMRNY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMRNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than OMRNY.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +13.25% price change this week, while OMRNY (@Electronic Components) price change was +2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

OMRNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+2.53% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FN($14.6B) has a higher market cap than OMRNY($5.51B). OMRNY has higher P/E ratio than FN: OMRNY (51.85) vs FN (44.70). FN YTD gains are higher at: 86.420 vs. OMRNY (-15.450). OMRNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 64.8B vs. FN (409M). OMRNY has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FN (934M). FN has less debt than OMRNY: FN (5.47M) vs OMRNY (204B). OMRNY has higher revenues than FN: OMRNY (793B) vs FN (3.42B).
FNOMRNYFN / OMRNY
Capitalization14.6B5.51B265%
EBITDA409M64.8B1%
Gain YTD86.420-15.450-559%
P/E Ratio44.7051.8586%
Revenue3.42B793B0%
Total Cash934M161B1%
Total Debt5.47M204B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs OMRNY: Fundamental Ratings
FN
OMRNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
4992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1497
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9024

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMRNY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (74) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that OMRNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMRNY (100) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew significantly faster than OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMRNY (92) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as OMRNY (57) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMRNY (97) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew significantly faster than OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNOMRNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMRNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BXSY14.650.07
+0.48%
Bexil Investment Trust
CXH7.96N/A
N/A
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
BGJTF9.92N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Plc. (The)
RORO16.29-0.05
-0.30%
ATAC US Rotation ETF
BAR41.66-0.80
-1.88%
GraniteShares Gold Trust

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been loosely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FN jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
-0.62%
APH - FN
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.34%
CLS - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
FLEX - FN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
GLW - FN
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.57%
BHE - FN
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
More

OMRNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMRNY has been loosely correlated with MRAAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMRNY jumps, then MRAAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMRNY
1D Price
Change %
OMRNY100%
+0.23%
MRAAY - OMRNY
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
TTDKY - OMRNY
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
APH - OMRNY
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
FN - OMRNY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
LFUS - OMRNY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More