FN
Price
$478.32
Change
-$3.42 (-0.71%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
17.14B
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMRNY
Price
$25.18
Change
-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.96B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN vs OMRNY

Header iconFN vs OMRNY Comparison
Open Charts FN vs OMRNYBanner chart's image
Fabrinet
Price$478.32
Change-$3.42 (-0.71%)
Volume$256K
Capitalization17.14B
OMRON
Price$25.18
Change-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Volume$17.89K
Capitalization4.96B
FN vs OMRNY Comparison Chart in %
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMRNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FN vs. OMRNY commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a Buy and OMRNY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FN: $478.32 vs. OMRNY: $25.17)
Brand notoriety: FN and OMRNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 40% vs. OMRNY: 52%
Market capitalization -- FN: $17.14B vs. OMRNY: $4.96B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $17.14B. OMRNY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $4.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $168.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMRNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMRNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than OMRNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMRNY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMRNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than OMRNY.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а +0.60% price change this week, while OMRNY (@Electronic Components) price change was +0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

OMRNY is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.43% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FN($17.1B) has a higher market cap than OMRNY($4.96B). FN has higher P/E ratio than OMRNY: FN (49.31) vs OMRNY (27.03). FN YTD gains are higher at: 117.537 vs. OMRNY (-24.985). OMRNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 91.7B vs. FN (428M). OMRNY has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FN (969M). FN has less debt than OMRNY: FN (5.16M) vs OMRNY (210B). OMRNY has higher revenues than FN: OMRNY (821B) vs FN (3.59B).
FNOMRNYFN / OMRNY
Capitalization17.1B4.96B344%
EBITDA428M91.7B0%
Gain YTD117.537-24.985-470%
P/E Ratio49.3127.03182%
Revenue3.59B821B0%
Total Cash969M161B1%
Total Debt5.16M210B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs OMRNY: Fundamental Ratings
FN
OMRNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
837
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
4985
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1099
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMRNY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FN (75) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that OMRNY’s stock grew significantly faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMRNY (100) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew significantly faster than OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMRNY (85) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

FN's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as OMRNY (61) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMRNY (99) in the null industry. This means that FN’s stock grew significantly faster than OMRNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNOMRNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMRNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNGD5.010.01
+0.20%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN
QLTA48.230.01
+0.02%
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
XXCH32.70N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Bull 2X Shares
ETH27.67-0.04
-0.14%
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust ETF
PJP107.85-0.23
-0.21%
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FN jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
-0.71%
CLS - FN
73%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
FLEX - FN
70%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
APH - FN
68%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
GLW - FN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
JBL - FN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
More

OMRNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMRNY has been loosely correlated with MRAAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMRNY jumps, then MRAAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMRNY
1D Price
Change %
OMRNY100%
-0.42%
MRAAY - OMRNY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
TTDKY - OMRNY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
APH - OMRNY
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
FN - OMRNY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
LFUS - OMRNY
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More