FN
Price
$359.44
Change
-$1.52 (-0.42%)
Updated
Sep 26, 03:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.9B
45 days until earnings call
GLW
Price
$79.22
Change
+$0.09 (+0.11%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.78B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FN vs GLW

Header iconFN vs GLW Comparison
Open Charts FN vs GLWBanner chart's image
Fabrinet
Price$359.44
Change-$1.52 (-0.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization12.9B
Corning
Price$79.22
Change+$0.09 (+0.11%)
Volume$4.01K
Capitalization67.78B
FN vs GLW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FN vs. GLW commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FN is a StrongBuy and GLW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FN: $360.95 vs. GLW: $79.13)
Brand notoriety: FN: Not notable vs. GLW: Notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FN: 75% vs. GLW: 114%
Market capitalization -- FN: $12.9B vs. GLW: $67.78B
FN [@Electronic Components] is valued at $12.9B. GLW’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $67.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $149.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FN and GLW are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GLW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLW is a better buy in the short-term than FN.

Price Growth

FN (@Electronic Components) experienced а -4.51% price change this week, while GLW (@Electronic Components) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

FN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.

GLW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.51% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($67.8B) has a higher market cap than FN($12.9B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than FN: GLW (84.18) vs FN (39.36). GLW YTD gains are higher at: 69.107 vs. FN (64.158). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.83B vs. FN (409M). GLW has more cash in the bank: 1.49B vs. FN (934M). FN has less debt than GLW: FN (5.47M) vs GLW (8.5B). GLW has higher revenues than FN: GLW (14.2B) vs FN (3.42B).
FNGLWFN / GLW
Capitalization12.9B67.8B19%
EBITDA409M2.83B14%
Gain YTD64.15869.10793%
P/E Ratio39.3684.1847%
Revenue3.42B14.2B24%
Total Cash934M1.49B63%
Total Debt5.47M8.5B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FN vs GLW: Fundamental Ratings
FN
GLW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2190
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
118
SMR RATING
1..100
4978
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
392
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1750
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLW's Valuation (22) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (72). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (11). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's SMR Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (78). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FN (39). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (50). This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNGLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHI8.94N/A
N/A
Pioneer Municipal High Income Fund
WEEL19.93-0.01
-0.04%
Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF
XRMI17.56-0.06
-0.34%
Global X S&P 500® Risk Managed Inc ETF
PCEF19.89-0.09
-0.45%
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF
IWR95.15-0.74
-0.77%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

FN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FN has been loosely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FN jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FN
1D Price
Change %
FN100%
-1.56%
APH - FN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
CLS - FN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
FLEX - FN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
GLW - FN
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
BHE - FN
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
More

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
-0.98%
FLEX - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
APH - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
CLS - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
SANM - GLW
66%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
TEL - GLW
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More