FMZNF
Price
$0.42
Change
+$0.01 (+2.44%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
572.07M
VRAR
Price
$1.26
Change
-$0.07 (-5.26%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
28M
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMZNF vs VRAR

Header iconFMZNF vs VRAR Comparison
Open Charts FMZNF vs VRARBanner chart's image
QORIA
Price$0.42
Change+$0.01 (+2.44%)
Volume$200
Capitalization572.07M
Glimpse Group (The)
Price$1.26
Change-$0.07 (-5.26%)
Volume$730
Capitalization28M
FMZNF vs VRAR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMZNF vs. VRAR commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMZNF is a Hold and VRAR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FMZNF: $0.42 vs. VRAR: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: FMZNF and VRAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMZNF: 1% vs. VRAR: 37%
Market capitalization -- FMZNF: $572.07M vs. VRAR: $28M
FMZNF [@Computer Communications] is valued at $572.07M. VRAR’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMZNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMZNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than VRAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMZNF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRAR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMZNF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • VRAR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMZNF is a better buy in the short-term than VRAR.

Price Growth

FMZNF (@Computer Communications) experienced а +14.11% price change this week, while VRAR (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRAR is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+0.40% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMZNF($572M) has a higher market cap than VRAR($28M). FMZNF YTD gains are higher at: 25.067 vs. VRAR (-46.154). FMZNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.61M vs. VRAR (-3.75M). FMZNF has higher revenues than VRAR: FMZNF (106M) vs VRAR (8.76M).
FMZNFVRARFMZNF / VRAR
Capitalization572M28M2,043%
EBITDA4.61M-3.75M-123%
Gain YTD25.067-46.154-54%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue106M8.76M1,210%
Total CashN/A7.06M-
Total DebtN/A167K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMZNF: Fundamental Ratings
FMZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMZNFVRAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STXS2.500.31
+14.16%
Stereotaxis
IART12.960.33
+2.61%
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corp
GKOS84.65-3.35
-3.81%
Glaukos Corp
MURA1.59-0.09
-5.36%
Mural Oncology plc
PBR12.12-0.96
-7.34%
Petroleo Brasileiro Sa-Petrobras ADS (REP 1 Common Share)

FMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMZNF and HSTM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMZNF and HSTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMZNF
1D Price
Change %
FMZNF100%
N/A
HSTM - FMZNF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
AGYS - FMZNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.97%
BLBX - FMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
BNZI - FMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+33.66%
VRAR - FMZNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
More

VRAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRAR has been loosely correlated with NUKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRAR jumps, then NUKK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRAR
1D Price
Change %
VRAR100%
-4.32%
NUKK - VRAR
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.30%
RDZN - VRAR
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
MAPS - VRAR
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.36%
NXPL - VRAR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AISP - VRAR
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More