FMZNF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
VRAR
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
95 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FMZNF vs VRAR

Header iconFMZNF vs VRAR Comparison
Open Charts FMZNF vs VRARBanner chart's image
QORIA
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
Glimpse Group (The)
Price$0.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$141.5K
CapitalizationN/A
FMZNF vs VRAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMZNF vs. VRAR commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMZNF is a Hold and VRAR is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FMZNF: $0.34 vs. VRAR: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: FMZNF and VRAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMZNF: 100% vs. VRAR: 130%
Market capitalization -- FMZNF: $174.1M vs. VRAR: $18.82M
FMZNF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $174.1M. VRAR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $18.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMZNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRAR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMZNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than VRAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VRAR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VRAR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FMZNF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VRAR (@Packaged Software) price change was +16.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRAR is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMZNF($174M) has a higher market cap than VRAR($18.8M). FMZNF YTD gains are higher at: 98.529 vs. VRAR (-38.053). VRAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.57M vs. FMZNF (-53.63M). FMZNF has more cash in the bank: 34.9M vs. VRAR (5.22M). VRAR has less debt than FMZNF: VRAR (736K) vs FMZNF (3.31M). FMZNF has higher revenues than VRAR: FMZNF (63.7M) vs VRAR (11.8M).
FMZNFVRARFMZNF / VRAR
Capitalization174M18.8M926%
EBITDA-53.63M-9.57M560%
Gain YTD98.529-38.053-259%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue63.7M11.8M540%
Total Cash34.9M5.22M668%
Total Debt3.31M736K450%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMZNF: Fundamental Ratings
FMZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
58
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VRAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

FMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMZNF and HSTM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMZNF and HSTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMZNF
1D Price
Change %
FMZNF100%
N/A
HSTM - FMZNF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
AGYS - FMZNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
BLBX - FMZNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
BNZI - FMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+10.86%
LDTC - FMZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.31%
More

VRAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRAR and DAVE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRAR and DAVE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRAR
1D Price
Change %
VRAR100%
N/A
DAVE - VRAR
23%
Poorly correlated
-11.58%
APP - VRAR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
GRAB - VRAR
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
CLBT - VRAR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
FMZNF - VRAR
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More