FMXUF
Price
$10.79
Change
+$0.23 (+2.18%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
30.99B
NWINF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.05 (-4.76%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
70.86M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMXUF vs NWINF

Header iconFMXUF vs NWINF Comparison
Open Charts FMXUF vs NWINFBanner chart's image
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB
Price$10.79
Change+$0.23 (+2.18%)
Volume$100
Capitalization30.99B
Naked Wines
Price$1.00
Change-$0.05 (-4.76%)
Volume$2.61K
Capitalization70.86M
FMXUF vs NWINF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMXUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMXUF vs. NWINF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMXUF is a Hold and NWINF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FMXUF: $10.79 vs. NWINF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: FMXUF and NWINF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMXUF: 83% vs. NWINF: 75%
Market capitalization -- FMXUF: $30.99B vs. NWINF: $70.86M
FMXUF [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $30.99B. NWINF’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $70.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $21.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMXUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNWINF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMXUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NWINF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMXUF is a better buy in the long-term than NWINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMXUF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWINF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMXUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • NWINF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMXUF is a better buy in the short-term than NWINF.

Price Growth

FMXUF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWINF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -7.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+1.12% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMXUF($31B) has a higher market cap than NWINF($70.9M). NWINF has higher P/E ratio than FMXUF: NWINF (62.11) vs FMXUF (26.18). NWINF YTD gains are higher at: 73.913 vs. FMXUF (23.229). FMXUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68.2B vs. NWINF (5.97M). FMXUF has more cash in the bank: 165B vs. NWINF (43M). NWINF has less debt than FMXUF: NWINF (22.7M) vs FMXUF (233B). FMXUF has higher revenues than NWINF: FMXUF (736B) vs NWINF (357M).
FMXUFNWINFFMXUF / NWINF
Capitalization31B70.9M43,724%
EBITDA68.2B5.97M1,142,761%
Gain YTD23.22973.91331%
P/E Ratio26.1862.1142%
Revenue736B357M206,162%
Total Cash165B43M383,721%
Total Debt233B22.7M1,026,432%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMXUF vs NWINF: Fundamental Ratings
FMXUF
NWINF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
6594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4955
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6124
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMXUF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NWINF (86). This means that FMXUF’s stock grew similarly to NWINF’s over the last 12 months.

FMXUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWINF (100). This means that FMXUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWINF’s over the last 12 months.

FMXUF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as NWINF (94). This means that FMXUF’s stock grew similarly to NWINF’s over the last 12 months.

FMXUF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NWINF (55). This means that FMXUF’s stock grew similarly to NWINF’s over the last 12 months.

NWINF's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMXUF (61). This means that NWINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMXUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMXUFNWINF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMXUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIEGY130.593.57
+2.81%
Siemens AG
ORKLY10.820.11
+1.03%
Orkla ASA
AILQF0.26N/A
N/A
AirIQ Inc.
AITUF7.80N/A
N/A
Anritsu Corp.
VLDX0.49-0.01
-2.96%
Velo3D, Inc.

FMXUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMXUF and TBVPY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMXUF and TBVPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMXUF
1D Price
Change %
FMXUF100%
N/A
TBVPY - FMXUF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNBWF - FMXUF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWINF - FMXUF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.12%
KNBWY - FMXUF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
HINKF - FMXUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWINF and HEINY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWINF and HEINY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWINF
1D Price
Change %
NWINF100%
-5.12%
HEINY - NWINF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
FMXUF - NWINF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KNBWY - NWINF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
HINKF - NWINF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LPRRF - NWINF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More