Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMXSX vs RWEBX
FMXSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMXSX vs RWEBX
Federated Hermes Max-Cap Index Svc
Price$8.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.97M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.96
Change-$0.14 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.49B
FMXSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMXSX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMXSX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 203B vs. FMXSX (249M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than FMXSX: RWEBX (0.79) vs FMXSX (0.68). FMXSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: FMXSX (32 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). FMXSX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). FMXSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMXSX: RWEBX (250) vs FMXSX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. FMXSX (5.40). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.78 vs. FMXSX (-11.62).
| FMXSX | RWEBX | FMXSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.06 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.06 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.250 | 6.649 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249M | 203B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.79 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 5.78 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.51 | 21.78 | -12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.62 | 45.78 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.91 | 65.35 | -69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement