FMX vs TAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMX is a Hold and TAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FMX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FMX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FMX (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while TAP (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +13.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
FMX is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-2.27% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| FMX | TAP | FMX / TAP | |
| Capitalization | 233B | 14.3B | 1,629% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.17B | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.874 | 6.856 | -392% |
| P/E Ratio | 112.91 | 15.41 | 733% |
| Revenue | N/A | 11.7B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 869M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 6.27B | - |
FMX | TAP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 79 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 25 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMX's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (34) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (73) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's SMR Rating (79) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (85) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Price Growth Rating (25) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMX (79) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMX’s over the last 12 months.
FMX's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAP (99) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew significantly faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.
| FMX | TAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 0% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | N/A |
FMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMX has been loosely correlated with ABEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMX jumps, then ABEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMX | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| ABEV - FMX | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PRNDY - FMX | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| DEO - FMX | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| STZ - FMX | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TAP - FMX | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
More | ||||
TAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.