FMX
Price
$85.33
Change
-$0.12 (-0.14%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.62B
48 days until earnings call
TAP
Price
$50.41
Change
+$0.50 (+1.00%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.97B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMX vs TAP

Header iconFMX vs TAP Comparison
Open Charts FMX vs TAPBanner chart's image
Fomento Economico Mexicano SAB DE CV
Price$85.33
Change-$0.12 (-0.14%)
Volume$2.55K
Capitalization29.62B
Molson Coors Beverage
Price$50.41
Change+$0.50 (+1.00%)
Volume$21.52K
Capitalization9.97B
FMX vs TAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMX vs. TAP commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMX is a Hold and TAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FMX: $85.45 vs. TAP: $49.91)
Brand notoriety: FMX: Not notable vs. TAP: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMX: 50% vs. TAP: 77%
Market capitalization -- FMX: $29.62B vs. TAP: $9.97B
FMX [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] is valued at $29.62B. TAP’s [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] market capitalization is $9.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry ranges from $116.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy] industry is $22.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TAP is a better buy in the long-term than FMX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAP is a better buy in the short-term than FMX.

Price Growth

FMX (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMX is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy (-0.82% weekly)

The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMX($29.6B) has a higher market cap than TAP($9.97B). FMX has higher P/E ratio than TAP: FMX (37.50) vs TAP (9.94). FMX YTD gains are higher at: 6.811 vs. TAP (-11.461). TAP has less debt than FMX: TAP (6.32B) vs FMX (265B).
FMXTAPFMX / TAP
Capitalization29.6B9.97B297%
EBITDA75.3BN/A-
Gain YTD6.811-11.461-59%
P/E Ratio37.509.94377%
Revenue813BN/A-
Total Cash162BN/A-
Total Debt265B6.32B4,194%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMX vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
FMX
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
970
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5749
SMR RATING
1..100
7878
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1456
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1885

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMX's Valuation (12) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (37) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (57) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's SMR Rating (78) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (78) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (80) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.

FMX's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TAP (56) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMXTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCDV24.770.38
+1.57%
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF
RPV97.750.34
+0.35%
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF
FGM56.390.20
+0.35%
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX® ETF
DAPR38.370.06
+0.16%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bffr ETF Apr
SYNB30.27N/A
N/A
Putnam BioRevolution ETF

FMX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMX has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMX jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMX
1D Price
Change %
FMX100%
+2.13%
CCU - FMX
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
ABEV - FMX
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
BUD - FMX
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
DEO - FMX
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
TAP - FMX
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

TAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with SAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then SAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAP
1D Price
Change %
TAP100%
+0.20%
SAM - TAP
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
STZ - TAP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
DEO - TAP
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
BUD - TAP
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
CCU - TAP
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More