FMX vs STZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMX is a Hold and STZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FMX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- STZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMX’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FMX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FMX (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -4.05% price change this week, while STZ (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +4.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
FMX is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.
STZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-2.27% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| FMX | STZ | FMX / STZ | |
| Capitalization | 233B | 48.6B | 479% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 2.86B | - |
| Gain YTD | -26.874 | 1.177 | -2,284% |
| P/E Ratio | 112.91 | 30.86 | 366% |
| Revenue | N/A | 9.82B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 200M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 11.7B | - |
FMX | STZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 46 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMX's Valuation (25) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (47) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry. This means that FMX’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (73) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's SMR Rating (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (85) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (79) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
STZ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FMX (27) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to FMX’s over the last 12 months.
| FMX | STZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 0% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 9 days ago 0% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 40% |
FMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMX has been loosely correlated with ABEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMX jumps, then ABEV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMX | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| ABEV - FMX | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PRNDY - FMX | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| DEO - FMX | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| STZ - FMX | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TAP - FMX | 14% Poorly correlated | +3.22% | ||
More | ||||
STZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STZ | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| TAP - STZ | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| DEO - STZ | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NAPA - STZ | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| HEINY - STZ | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| ABEV - STZ | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||