Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUIX vs HBLAX
FMUIX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FMUIX vs HBLAX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv IS
Price$15.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
FMUIX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUIX vs. HBLAX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUIX is a Buy and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FMUIX (1.36B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FMUIX: HBLAX (3.35) vs FMUIX (2.32). FMUIX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FMUIX (15 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FMUIX (0.83). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUIX (23.00). HBLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUIX: HBLAX (2000) vs FMUIX (1000000). FMUIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. HBLAX (4.24). FMUIX return over 5 years is better than : 28.71 vs. HBLAX (15.06).
| FMUIX | HBLAX | FMUIX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.89 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.89 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.853 | 7.120 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 11.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 3.35 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | 4.24 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.58 | 11.17 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.71 | 15.06 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.54 | 41.91 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement