Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUCX vs HBLVX
FMUCX vs HBLVX Comparison
Open Charts FMUCX vs HBLVX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv C
Price$14.98
Change+$0.05 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$15.07
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
FMUCX vs HBLVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUCX vs. HBLVX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUCX is a Buy and HBLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FMUCX (1.34B). HBLVX pays higher dividends than FMUCX: HBLVX (3.61) vs FMUCX (1.34). FMUCX was incepted earlier than HBLVX: FMUCX (22 years) vs HBLVX (11 years). FMUCX (1.83) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUCX (23.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUCX: HBLVX (0) vs FMUCX (1500). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.50 vs. FMUCX (4.87). FMUCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.10 vs. HBLVX (17.04).
| FMUCX | HBLVX | FMUCX / HBLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.56 | 311% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.56 | 327% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.297 | 6.686 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 11.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 3.61 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.87 | 5.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.71 | 15.85 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.10 | 17.04 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.69 | 46.27 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement