Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLYX
FMUAX vs HBLYX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLYX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv A
Price$16.05
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
Hartford Balanced Income Y
Price$15.05
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
FMUAX vs HBLYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLYX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Hold and HBLYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLYX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. FMUAX (1.42B). HBLYX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLYX (3.42) vs FMUAX (1.65). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLYX: FMUAX (22 years) vs HBLYX (19 years). FMUAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HBLYX (0.67). HBLYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUAX (23.00). FMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLYX: FMUAX (1500) vs HBLYX (250000). FMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.43 vs. HBLYX (8.30). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.33 vs. HBLYX (10.98).
| FMUAX | HBLYX | FMUAX / HBLYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.67 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.67 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.260 | 1.217 | 104% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 11.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 3.42 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.43 | 8.30 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.24 | 15.66 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.33 | 10.98 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.61 | 56.06 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers