Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLIX
FMUAX vs HBLIX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLIX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv A
Price$14.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
Hartford Balanced Income I
Price$14.85
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
FMUAX vs HBLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLIX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLIX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FMUAX (1.34B). HBLIX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLIX (3.58) vs FMUAX (2.09). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLIX: FMUAX (22 years) vs HBLIX (15 years). FMUAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HBLIX (0.65). HBLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUAX (23.00). FMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLIX: FMUAX (1500) vs HBLIX (2000). FMUAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. HBLIX (5.35). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.83 vs. HBLIX (16.45).
| FMUAX | HBLIX | FMUAX / HBLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.65 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.65 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 6.667 | 40% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2000 | 75% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 11.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 3.58 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 5.35 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 15.49 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.83 | 16.45 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.26 | 44.81 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers