Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLFX
FMUAX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLFX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv A
Price$14.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.34B
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.92B
FMUAX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. FMUAX (1.34B). HBLFX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLFX (3.66) vs FMUAX (2.09). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: FMUAX (22 years) vs HBLFX (8 years). FMUAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUAX (23.00). FMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: FMUAX (1500) vs HBLFX (1000000). FMUAX (5.66) and HBLFX (5.44) have marching annual gain over last year. FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.83 vs. HBLFX (16.90).
| FMUAX | HBLFX | FMUAX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.56 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.56 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.673 | 6.715 | 40% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 11.9B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 3.66 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 5.44 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.32 | 15.69 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.83 | 16.90 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement