Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMUAX vs HBLFX
FMUAX vs HBLFX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLFX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv A
Price$14.57
Change-$0.09 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
Hartford Balanced Income F
Price$14.62
Change-$0.08 (-0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.79B
FMUAX vs HBLFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLFX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. FMUAX (1.33B). HBLFX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLFX (3.68) vs FMUAX (2.13). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLFX: FMUAX (22 years) vs HBLFX (8 years). FMUAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HBLFX (0.56). HBLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUAX (23.00). FMUAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLFX: FMUAX (1500) vs HBLFX (1000000). HBLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.78 vs. FMUAX (3.18). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.87 vs. HBLFX (17.86).
| FMUAX | HBLFX | FMUAX / HBLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.56 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.56 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.474 | 4.096 | -12% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 11.8B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 3.68 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.18 | 4.78 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.49 | 16.94 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.87 | 17.86 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement