Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBCX
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Income
Price$15.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.25B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.80
Change-$0.48 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. FMSDX (3.25B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FMSDX (3.77) vs RLBCX (1.46). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FMSDX (0.80). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FMSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. RLBCX (9.58). FMSDX return over 5 years is better than : 53.24 vs. RLBCX (39.44).
| FMSDX | RLBCX | FMSDX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.89 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.89 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.800 | 15.928 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.25B | 269B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.77 | 1.46 | 258% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | 9.58 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 42.30 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.24 | 39.44 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement