Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMSDX vs RLBCX
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FMSDX vs RLBCX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Income
Price$16.02
Change+$0.13 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.39B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.13
Change-$0.57 (-1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets269.72B
FMSDX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMSDX vs. RLBCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMSDX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. FMSDX (3.39B). FMSDX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FMSDX (3.70) vs RLBCX (1.62). FMSDX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FMSDX (8 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) is less costly to investors than FMSDX (0.80). FMSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 230.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). FMSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FMSDX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FMSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. RLBCX (10.97). FMSDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.93 vs. RLBCX (33.82).
| FMSDX | RLBCX | FMSDX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.89 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.89 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.387 | 2.445 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 270B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.70 | 1.62 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | 10.97 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.89 | 35.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.93 | 33.82 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement