FMS
Price
$28.12
Change
-$0.20 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
11.2B
30 days until earnings call
VLXC
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMS vs VLXC

Header iconFMS vs VLXC Comparison
Open Charts FMS vs VLXCBanner chart's image
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$28.12
Change-$0.20 (-0.71%)
Volume$119.52K
Capitalization11.2B
Veltex
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.54K
Capitalization13.48M
FMS vs VLXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMS vs. VLXC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMS is a Hold and VLXC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FMS: $28.12 vs. VLXC: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: FMS and VLXC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMS: 25% vs. VLXC: 7%
Market capitalization -- FMS: $11.2B vs. VLXC: $13.48M
FMS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $11.2B. VLXC’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $13.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLXC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLXC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the long-term than VLXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLXC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VLXC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLXC is a better buy in the short-term than FMS.

Price Growth

FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.04% price change this week, while VLXC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +18.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.64% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($11.2B) has a higher market cap than VLXC($13.5M). FMS (27.631) and VLXC (26.866) have similar YTD gains . FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. VLXC (19.9K). VLXC has less debt than FMS: VLXC (1.57M) vs FMS (12.1B).
FMSVLXCFMS / VLXC
Capitalization11.2B13.5M82,963%
EBITDA3.21BN/A-
Gain YTD27.63126.866103%
P/E Ratio20.80N/A-
Revenue19.5BN/A-
Total Cash1.54B19.9K7,738,693%
Total Debt12.1B1.57M773,163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS vs VLXC: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
VLXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
84100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (12) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLXC (99) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew significantly faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (84) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

VLXC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (44) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that VLXC’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMSVLXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFLV22.450.15
+0.68%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
SMMV42.500.16
+0.38%
iShares MSCI USA Sm-Cp Min Vol Fctr ETF
RWJ45.360.09
+0.20%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
BKF41.430.02
+0.05%
iShares MSCI BIC ETF
HYBX30.54-0.01
-0.05%
TCW High Yield Bond ETF

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
-0.71%
DVA - FMS
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OPCH - FMS
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
ADUS - FMS
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
CHE - FMS
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
BKD - FMS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More

VLXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLXC and BUGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLXC and BUGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLXC
1D Price
Change %
VLXC100%
-3.38%
BUGDF - VLXC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMS - VLXC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
RKAGY - VLXC
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.57%
RHCGF - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPS - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.55%
More