FMS
Price
$23.17
Change
+$0.08 (+0.35%)
Updated
Feb 24, 11:27 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.2B
One day until earnings call
VLXC
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
13.48M
Ad is loading...

FMS vs VLXC

Header iconFMS vs VLXC Comparison
Open Charts FMS vs VLXCBanner chart's image
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$23.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.35%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization11.2B
Veltex
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$157.06K
Capitalization13.48M
FMS vs VLXC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMS vs. VLXC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMS is a Hold and VLXC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (FMS: $23.09 vs. VLXC: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: FMS and VLXC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMS: 206% vs. VLXC: 375%
Market capitalization -- FMS: $11.2B vs. VLXC: $13.48M
FMS [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $11.2B. VLXC’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $13.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLXC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLXC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the long-term than VLXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -1.49% price change this week, while VLXC (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.52% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($11.2B) has a higher market cap than VLXC($13.5M). VLXC YTD gains are higher at: 31.791 vs. FMS (1.988). FMS has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. VLXC (19.9K). VLXC has less debt than FMS: VLXC (1.57M) vs FMS (12.1B).
FMSVLXCFMS / VLXC
Capitalization11.2B13.5M82,963%
EBITDA3.21BN/A-
Gain YTD1.98831.7916%
P/E Ratio20.80N/A-
Revenue19.5BN/A-
Total Cash1.54B19.9K7,738,693%
Total Debt12.1B1.57M773,163%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS vs VLXC: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
VLXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
84100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
60100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (14) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLXC (95) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew significantly faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (84) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

VLXC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FMS (47) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that VLXC’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+0.65%
DVA - FMS
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.41%
UHS - FMS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
USPH - FMS
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
HCA - FMS
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.58%
HCSG - FMS
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.13%
More

VLXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLXC and BUGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLXC and BUGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLXC
1D Price
Change %
VLXC100%
-1.89%
BUGDF - VLXC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMS - VLXC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
RKAGY - VLXC
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RHCGF - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPS - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.27%
More