FMS
Price
$24.77
Change
+$0.46 (+1.89%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.54B
58 days until earnings call
VLXC
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMS vs VLXC

Header iconFMS vs VLXC Comparison
Open Charts FMS vs VLXCBanner chart's image
Fresenius Medical Care AG
Price$24.77
Change+$0.46 (+1.89%)
Volume$391.87K
Capitalization14.54B
Veltex
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$5.6K
Capitalization7.8M
FMS vs VLXC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMS vs. VLXC commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMS is a Hold and VLXC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FMS: $24.77 vs. VLXC: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: FMS and VLXC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMS: 142% vs. VLXC: 70%
Market capitalization -- FMS: $14.54B vs. VLXC: $7.8M
FMS [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $14.54B. VLXC’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $7.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $98.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLXC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLXC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the long-term than VLXC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLXC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • VLXC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMS is a better buy in the short-term than VLXC.

Price Growth

FMS (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -3.62% price change this week, while VLXC (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+0.46% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMS($14.5B) has a higher market cap than VLXC($7.8M). VLXC YTD gains are higher at: 18.657 vs. FMS (12.426). FMS has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. VLXC (6.27K). VLXC has less debt than FMS: VLXC (2.71M) vs FMS (11B).
FMSVLXCFMS / VLXC
Capitalization14.5B7.8M185,802%
EBITDA3.17BN/A-
Gain YTD12.42618.65767%
P/E Ratio19.05N/A-
Revenue19.5BN/A-
Total Cash2.19B6.27K34,950,527%
Total Debt11B2.71M405,455%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMS vs VLXC: Fundamental Ratings
FMS
VLXC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
86100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMS's Valuation (9) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLXC (69) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's SMR Rating (86) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as VLXC (55) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew similarly to VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

FMS's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VLXC (100) in the null industry. This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VLXC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMSVLXC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLXC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TQQY18.580.11
+0.57%
GraniteShares YieldBOOST QQQ ETF
GOF15.130.05
+0.33%
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
NCV14.850.01
+0.07%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund
FLJJ30.93-0.04
-0.12%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Flr 5 Jan/Jul ETF
SEPT33.79-0.08
-0.23%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF

FMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMS has been loosely correlated with DVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMS jumps, then DVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMS
1D Price
Change %
FMS100%
+1.89%
DVA - FMS
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
OPCH - FMS
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
CHE - FMS
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
JYNT - FMS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
USPH - FMS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

VLXC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLXC and BUGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLXC and BUGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLXC
1D Price
Change %
VLXC100%
+13.57%
BUGDF - VLXC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FMS - VLXC
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
RKAGY - VLXC
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RHCGF - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMPS - VLXC
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More